Website feedback tool
Website feedback tool for agencies
Share one review link. Clients point to the change they want and leave a comment on the page. Send the review to Claude, Cursor, or Codex, then check the proof before closing the request.
A website feedback tool lets clients comment directly on a live or staged website. Each request stays connected to the page area they selected, along with the original screenshot and the details needed to understand what they saw.
DesignLoop keeps the client review, open requests, implementation progress, and final approval together. Agencies spend less time matching comments to screenshots, emails, chat messages, and documents.
How DesignLoop works
- Create a review. Add the website URL and start a named feedback round.
- Share one link. Clients open the website, point to the change they want, and leave their comment. They do not need a DesignLoop account.
- Review the result. Send the open feedback to Claude, Cursor, or Codex. Check the returned proof before marking a request complete.
The review stays available as the website changes, so the agency can return to the original request during implementation and approval.
Give clients a clearer way to comment
Clients review the website in their browser. They can select a page area, leave a comment, suggest replacement copy, request that selected text be removed, and attach reference images.
A useful request might say:
On mobile, this signup button extends past the right side of the card. Keep it inside the card with the same spacing on both sides.
DesignLoop keeps that request with the page, selected area, original screenshot, and device size. The client can focus on the result they want without writing a long explanation of where the problem appears.
What arrives with each request
| Review detail | What it answers |
|---|---|
| Page and selected area | Where does the change belong? |
| Original screenshot | What did the client see when they commented? |
| Device details | Did the issue appear on mobile, tablet, or desktop? |
| Suggested copy | What wording should replace the current text? |
| Reference images | Is there an example of the intended result? |
| Review round and status | Is the request active, completed, or reopened? |
The original request remains readable after the website changes. That gives the owner a consistent point of reference when checking the finished work.
Keep each review round organized
Every review can have named versions for separate feedback rounds. One version stays open for new comments. Closed versions remain available as read-only history until the owner chooses how long to keep them.
Active shows the feedback that still needs attention. History keeps completed and approved requests. Owners can group related comments into topics, filter by contributor, update several statuses together, and reopen a request when another pass is needed.
This works for a first website review, a launch checklist, or a later round of client changes. Each round keeps its own name and feedback numbers.
Send feedback to Claude, Cursor, or Codex
DesignLoop includes three ways to move a review into implementation. You can copy one request, share the current review, or connect the review through MCP.
With a connected review, you can follow private progress and check submitted screenshots in DesignLoop. Clients continue to see the normal review. Only the owner can mark their requests complete.
Use the coding agent feedback guide for a high-level comparison of the available handoff options.
Before approving the work, follow the website change checklist to compare the updated page with the original request.
Review websites and PDFs
Website reviews let clients comment on the page they are viewing. PDF reviews let them comment on a page, select a passage, suggest replacement text, and attach images.
Both review types use the same Active and History views, topics, contributor filters, versions, and owner approval process. Agencies can keep website and document feedback in the same project list.
What to look for in a website feedback tool
The right tool should match the way clients already review work. Before choosing one, check whether:
- Clients can begin from a shared link without creating an account.
- Comments remain connected to the relevant page area.
- The original screenshot stays available after the website changes.
- Replacement copy and reference images can travel with the request.
- Separate review rounds keep old and current feedback apart.
- The person responsible for the project controls final approval.
- Feedback can reach the tools used to implement the change.
DesignLoop is built for web agencies, freelance designers and developers, and small teams that use coding agents for implementation. It is especially useful when client comments currently arrive through several channels and someone has to turn them into a clean revision list.
Website feedback tool pricing
The trial lasts seven days and does not require a card. Guest reviewers do not count as paid seats.
| Plan | Monthly price | Active projects |
|---|---|---|
| Freelancer | $19 | 5 |
| Studio | $39 | 15 |
| Business | $99 | 50 |
Create a website review or read how to annotate a website before sending the first client link.
Frequently asked questions
What is a website feedback tool?
A website feedback tool lets clients, teammates, or testers comment directly on a web page. The comment stays with the part of the page they selected and includes a screenshot of what they saw.
Do clients need a DesignLoop account?
No. Clients open the shared review link, identify themselves as a guest, and leave comments without creating an account.
Can I collect feedback on a staging website?
Yes, when the staging website has a publicly reachable URL. Websites that require private network access or a separate login may need another review setup.
Can clients review PDFs?
Yes. PDF reviews support page comments, selected text, suggested replacement copy, and image attachments.
Can I send a review to Claude, Cursor, or Codex?
Yes. You can copy a request, share the current feedback, or use DesignLoop's live MCP connection.
Who marks a client request complete?
The project owner does. Coding agents can return progress and proof privately, but they cannot publish the final client-facing status.
Try it on a real project
Give the next feedback round one place to live.
Seven days free. No card. Client reviewers do not need an account.